system. Here is our interview:Q: Why do you think health care needed an overhaul?
A: Basic health care is a right, not a privilege. It's [now] a system built on capital and competition. This has some advantages, but not necessarily for the greater good. People should be as secure in their right to health care, as they are in the right for clean water, protection and security.
Q: As a doctor, do you support the recent changes in health care?
A: Basically I do, because it tends to move us to a universal (or single-payer, if you will, system which insures coverage for all). The question remains at what financial sacrifice?
Q: President Obama had to compromise to get his legislation passed. What do you think of his plan?
A: It moves medicine in the correct direction. There will always be compromises. After all, it's all politics, isn’t it? The compromises deal primarily with financial issues, not with the basic concepts of universal coverage.
Q: Will “Obamacare” help people?A: I hope so, and I believe it will. Should there be some negative aspects, or loopholes that come to pass in which the status of certain people may actually get worse, then Obama must lead in efforts to correct these loopholes.
Q: Can the U.S. afford President Obama's plan?
A: I don’t know. In my readings I haven't come up with an answer as to whether it will cost more, less, or about the same in the long run. The question should not be can we afford it. The question is, where are the country’s priorities. We as a country must understand that nothing is free. The ultimate question is, what in the way of taxes are we willing to pay in order to achieve health care reform.
Q: Do you think the government can run a complicated system like health care efficiently?
A: No, the country cannot run complicated systems well. I don’t know who can run complicated systems well – computers can, maybe. But does universal health care have to be so complicated? There are ways to make it less complicated and more available.
Q: Explain how.
A: The delivery of medical care can be handled by nurse practitioners for many issues that do not require the services of a doctor. This lowers costs and makes basic care more available. As far as less complicated, when dealing with medical providers today, you often deal with multiple insurance carriers -- who must communicate with each other. It would be less complicated to deal with one or two.
Q: Do you see a single-payer system as inevitable?
There is little doubt in my mind that we are in the agonizing process of moving towards universal health care, such as exists almost everywhere in the world. People want to be free of the fear of non-affordable health care, and this need will, by the demand of the people, eventually come to pass. We Americans, imbued with our historical fear of big government, and ever historically dedicated to what we believe are our “individual rights,” will have to change. We, as a society, will not be in a position, in the near future, where, rights such as health care will be relegated to each individual’s responsibility without thinking of the effects on our whole society. It would cause a two-tiered system which, as medicine becomes ever more costly, shouldn't exist.
Q: Do you see a single-payer system as inevitable?
There is little doubt in my mind that we are in the agonizing process of moving towards universal health care, such as exists almost everywhere in the world. People want to be free of the fear of non-affordable health care, and this need will, by the demand of the people, eventually come to pass. We Americans, imbued with our historical fear of big government, and ever historically dedicated to what we believe are our “individual rights,” will have to change. We, as a society, will not be in a position, in the near future, where, rights such as health care will be relegated to each individual’s responsibility without thinking of the effects on our whole society. It would cause a two-tiered system which, as medicine becomes ever more costly, shouldn't exist.
Q: I think some Americans worry about health care moving towards a system resembling socialism. How do you respond to these fears?A: Of course we already have it in the form of Medicare, don't we? It's interesting that we provide finances for the care of all Americans over a certain age, whatever their financial status, but not for all Americans yet to reach that age. Socialized medicine is OK after 65, but not before 65. Weird.
Q: Having spent your career as a doctor, give us some final thoughts on what you believe we face in improving health care:
A: [Like other industrialized countries] medical care should be available for everyone equally. It is one of the "rights" in "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," and it should be a guarantee that a caring society grants to its members. But we have to come to the realization that there are many tricky turns -- financial, philosophical, and ethical -- in our road to getting there.
Thank you, Carl, for your unique perspective. Healthcare is already universal, in the sense that it hits everyone as a need, a concern and a big expense.
You may also enjoy:
Keeping Up With The Jones ... In Denmark
How Will Changes In Health Care Effect You?
Protecting Your Skin
Vitamins For Your Health, Is Expensive Better?
You may also enjoy:
Keeping Up With The Jones ... In Denmark
How Will Changes In Health Care Effect You?
Protecting Your Skin
Vitamins For Your Health, Is Expensive Better?
" doctors), Dr. Andrew Weil (a proponent of 
makes a high end pepper mill, which reportedly will last through the years. The model I have in mind is called “Nancy.” That's right ... Nancy. Who knew pepper mills have names? Could it be a joke the French are playing on Americans? If so, they'll never admit it. 